Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Date: 2025-01-31 15:34:51
Message-ID: 9F58568C-EFE7-4EA9-92CC-6241D78010A9@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 31 Jan 2025, at 16:29, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

>> #ifdef ENABLE_GSS
>> -#if defined(HAVE_GSSAPI_H)
>> -#include <gssapi.h>
>> -#else
>> -#include <gssapi/gssapi.h>
>> -#endif /* HAVE_GSSAPI_H */
>> +#include "libpq/pg-gssapi.h"
>> #endif /* ENABLE_GSS */
>
> This #ifdef ENABLE_GSS probably isn't necessary anymore.

Yeah, I only left it for code documentation reasons to keep readers from
thinking the ifdef was missing and had to go chase it in the new file. It's
definitely not required though I for sure don't mind removing it if others feel
it's pointless.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-01-31 16:23:36 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-01-31 15:33:44 Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs