Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs
Date: 2025-01-31 15:33:44
Message-ID: 3776805.1738337624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I don't really know what to do about the "IO" abbreviation. The other sections
> un-abbreviate abbreviations, but I suspect that Input/Output will be less
> informative than IO to most...

I'd lean towards writing "I/O", but it's not a point I'd quibble over.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-01-31 15:34:51 Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-01-31 15:29:23 Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other