Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Date: 2025-03-25 23:06:30
Message-ID: 9E6BD828-B535-45F5-B7E1-909473CDDD8B@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 26 Mar 2025, at 00:01, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> How did that work before? Perhaps somebody just now added a libpq
> dependency to pg_regress.c?

I believe the libpq dependency came in 66d6086cbcbfc8 which wasn't all that
recent.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-03-25 23:10:16 Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-03-25 23:01:37 Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos