| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
| Date: | 2006-11-18 17:38:45 |
| Message-ID: | 9B929C5FDD5F57D65214D432@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, November 18, 2006 18:12:22 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> please note that I wasn't suggesting *we* check SPF, only that we
>> provide an SPF record in our DNS for those that do check it ...
>
> By publishing an SPF record you are saying that all mail using
> @postgresql.org domains must go over a particular mail server
That is not true .. that is only true if we publish -all ... if we publish
?all, we are saying that anything coming from "a mx" are *definitely* from
@postgresql.org, and that from other sources they *might* be ... with ?all, it
becomes more a means of Scoring for spam filters like Spamassassin then
anything else ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFX0Um4QvfyHIvDvMRAu4qAJ9IQMy0A2+oXoXTpNUTSr2scJyU4gCeOPTg
AxOt9jLUuw6OAWP4xpxkFys=
=cS6G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-11-18 18:12:47 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-11-18 17:12:22 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |