From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
Date: | 2006-11-18 18:12:47 |
Message-ID: | 200611181812470000@1605226161 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
> To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Sent: 18/11/06, 17:38:45
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [CORE] SPF Record ...
>
> That is not true .. that is only true if we publish -all ... if we publish
> ?all, we are saying that anything coming from "a mx" are *definitely* from
> @postgresql.org, and that from other sources they *might* be ...
So what's the point then? People either ignore the SPF record, or refuse mail from the 'might be's'.
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-18 19:29:16 | Re: SPF Record ... |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-11-18 17:38:45 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |