Re: Removal of support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Removal of support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
Date: 2020-01-03 21:57:54
Message-ID: 9A66074B-9910-4CF8-BB94-3B05D127B473@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 3 Jan 2020, at 07:49, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 11:45:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ah. The CF app doesn't understand that (and hence the cfbot ditto),
>> so you might want to repost just the currently-proposed patch to get
>> the cfbot to try it.
>
> Yes, let's do that. Here you go with a v2. While on it, I have
> noticed in the docs a mention to OpenSSL 1.0.0 regarding our
> sslcompression parameter in libpq, so a paragraph can be removed.

LGTM, switching to ready for committer.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-01-03 22:07:49 Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2020-01-03 21:14:22 Re: Greatest Common Divisor