Re: Greatest Common Divisor

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Date: 2020-01-03 21:14:22
Message-ID: 4625ac7e-217e-f1a5-e50d-901b3809637f@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/3/20 4:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Maybe a very simple solution is indeed to have a separate pg_math or
> pg_extra or whatever, which by default is *last* in the search_path.
> That would make a user's gcd() be chosen preferently, if one exists.

I'm liking the direction this is going.

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-01-03 21:57:54 Re: Removal of support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-01-03 21:10:43 Re: Greatest Common Divisor