Re: [HACKERS] with(isstrict) vs ISSTRICT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: strk <strk(at)keybit(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgis-devel(at)postgis(dot)refractions(dot)net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] with(isstrict) vs ISSTRICT
Date: 2003-11-21 07:16:18
Message-ID: 9994.1069398978@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

strk <strk(at)keybit(dot)net> writes:
> Does with(isStrict) still work ?

regression=# create function foo(int) returns int as
regression-# 'select $1' language sql with(isStrict);
CREATE FUNCTION
regression=# select version();
version
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 7.5devel on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20, compiled by GCC 2.95.3
(1 row)

Looks like it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-21 07:26:29 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-21 05:57:56 Re: problem running postmaster

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kurt Roeckx 2003-11-21 07:32:36 Re: 7.4 logging bug.
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-21 06:24:45 Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?