From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Satrapa <alex(at)lintelsys(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | "Randolf Richardson, DevNet SysOp 29" <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Date: | 2003-11-21 07:26:29 |
Message-ID: | 10045.1069399589@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alex Satrapa <alex(at)lintelsys(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> On Mac OS X (desktop version, at least) there are no shutdown scripts.
> All running applications are simply sent the "TERM" signal, then later
> sent the "KILL" signal. Luckily enough, PostgreSQL seems to respond to
> TERM by shutting down gracefully.
No "luckily" about it: that's been the standard shutdown procedure for
Unix systems since approximately forever, and the signal responses of
the Postgres backend were consciously chosen to behave well with it.
> Totally off topic, but this lack of shutdown scripts, along with a lack
> of proper package management are the two most painful faults in Mac OS X.
I dunno whether OS X is lacking in shutdown scripts or not --- but PG
is built to shut down cleanly on any moderately-standard Unix system,
whether you have a shutdown script for it or not. OS X is certainly
standard enough for this.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erick Papadakis | 2003-11-21 08:30:32 | PGSQL on shared hosting |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-21 07:16:18 | Re: [HACKERS] with(isstrict) vs ISSTRICT |