Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> We should benchmark the planner on increasingly large sets of
> relations on a typical developer machine and set geqo to whatever
> value the planner can handle in that length of time. I suspect even at
> 10s you're talking about substantially larger values than the current
> default.
The problem is to find some realistic "benchmark" cases. That's one
reason why I was pestering Andreas to see his actual use cases ...
regards, tom lane