From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Dropping training events |
Date: | 2018-11-08 13:18:42 |
Message-ID: | 9969d05c1045d0a29ab74615d5edcec1@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 2018-11-08 01:50, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On 11/7/18 9:36 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I'd like to propose that we drop the ability to register training
>> events
>> on the www.postgresql.org <http://www.postgresql.org> site.
>>
>> Reasons:
>>
>> 1. It's basically a system set up to game, where it helps to flood
>> with
>> a lot of instances and then cancel them (often without actually
>> removing
>> the registration on the website, and our moderators certainly don't
>> have
>> the time to go double-check which instances are actually happening
>> etc)
>
> Yeah, I think this is the crux of it: there are some people who are
> using the system fairly for promoting GA trainings with high-quality
> content that do happen. And then there is the above, which
> unfortunately
> is not just speculation but has been confirmed in multiple instances.
Would it be feasible to still have the training events, but blacklist
(in
an effective way) the abusers?
Just from the point of view of rewarding those people who do create good
value training + use the system fairly, and not punishing them because
some
places are abusing things.
?
+ Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-11-13 22:24:14 | Re: postgresql-archive.org |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-11-07 14:50:47 | Re: Dropping training events |