| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
| Date: | 2002-12-15 16:21:07 |
| Message-ID: | 9902.1039969267@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Do I need to increment the other interfaces that
>> _use_ libpq, like ecpg?
> If and only if the libpq API is part of their documented API. For ecpg I
> think this is not the case, but for libpq++ it would seem to be the case.
However, an app linked against libpq++ would also be linked against
libpq, and so the incompatibility will be flagged by the linker anyway.
I can see no need to bump libpq++'s own number.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-12-15 16:21:48 | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
| Previous Message | Al Sutton | 2002-12-15 15:06:04 | Re: [MLIST] Re: [mail] Re: Big 7.4 items - Replication |