| From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
| Date: | 2002-12-15 22:08:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20021215220848.GD42645@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:21:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> However, an app linked against libpq++ would also be linked against
> libpq, and so the incompatibility will be flagged by the linker anyway.
> I can see no need to bump libpq++'s own number.
Plus, of course, libpq++ being a C++ library will break compatibility at
some compiler upgrades--which isn't even necessarily visible to anyone
compiling a postgres release.
Jeroen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Al Sutton | 2002-12-15 22:15:40 | Re: [mail] Re: Big 7.4 items - Replication |
| Previous Message | cbbrowne | 2002-12-15 21:40:33 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group |