| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Owen Hartnett <owen(at)clipboardinc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487 |
| Date: | 2010-02-04 20:47:34 |
| Message-ID: | 9837222c1002041247r4ce5b23bi777ac03aebfce7f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
2010/2/4 Owen Hartnett <owen(at)clipboardinc(dot)com>:
>
> On Aug 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:22, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem?
>>>
>>> SO that I can tell that the patch really does fix it?
>>
>> No. That's the reason it has taken so long to figure out how to fix it
>> (which we hopefully have done now).
>
> Has a consensus been arrived at? Is this patch rolled into the current system?
The patch is included in the latest versions, yes. I don't recall
seeing any reports of the problem remaining after the patch, but it's
not 100% sure of course.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Ginsburg | 2010-02-04 20:50:03 | Re: Verify a record has a column in a plpgsql trigger |
| Previous Message | Owen Hartnett | 2010-02-04 20:44:06 | Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487 |