| From: | Owen Hartnett <owen(at)clipboardinc(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487 |
| Date: | 2010-02-04 20:44:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1DA276DE-BB99-4713-BB42-91520A8D2222@clipboardinc.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Aug 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:22, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com> wrote:
>> Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem?
>>
>> SO that I can tell that the patch really does fix it?
>
> No. That's the reason it has taken so long to figure out how to fix it
> (which we hopefully have done now).
Has a consensus been arrived at? Is this patch rolled into the current system?
I have a client wants to install W2K8 server release 2 and he's asking if there's any conflict. I can update him to the latest when he does.
Thanks,
-Owen
>
>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-02-04 20:47:34 | Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487 |
| Previous Message | Tim Landscheidt | 2010-02-04 19:34:35 | Re: Literals in foreign key definitions |