From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Foreign Data Wrapper |
Date: | 2017-12-21 20:50:44 |
Message-ID: | 97acda0d-85f5-83d0-1766-6d8c3b21466c@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/21/2017 5:14 AM, Virendra Shaktawat - Quipment India wrote:
>
> odbc_fdw
>
please don't top post, and please don't use graphics and HTML in your
email, this is a text based mailling list adhering to bottom/interleaved
posting standards.
While I'm not directly familiar with odbc_fdw, I suspect its a 'read
only' FDW
is that this odbc_fdw? https://github.com/ZhengYang/odbc_fdw
that was developed for pg 9.1 when ALL fdw's were read only as it was
brand new technology. since this defines the foreign table via a query,
well, there's no WAY it could be used to do an update.
this updated fork, https://github.com/CartoDB/odbc_fdw runs on newer
postgres, but also is based on a select statement, you can't UPDATE a
resultset...
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nicolas Paris | 2017-12-21 22:44:30 | Re: Foreign Data Wrapper |
Previous Message | Rakesh Kumar | 2017-12-21 20:50:17 | Re: Deadlock with one table - PostgreSQL is doing it right |