Re: Code review in dsa.c

From: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code review in dsa.c
Date: 2023-01-15 16:04:56
Message-ID: 959c08bb-3b3d-4143-b247-86527d5e5cc4@Spark
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

HI,

On Jan 15, 2023, 23:43 +0800, Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, wrote:
> Hi, hackers
>
> Found  some functions in dsa.c are not used anymore.
>
> dsa_create
> dsa_attach
> dsa_get_handle
> dsa_trim
> dsa_dump
>
> We once used dsa_create to create DSA and  it ’s all replaced by dsa_create_in_place since commit 31ae1638ce.
> dsa_attach and dsa_get_handle cooperate with dsa_create.
> dsa_trim and dsa_dump are introduced by DSA original commit 13df76a537 , but not used since then.
>
> So, they are all dead codes, provide a patch to remove them.

Patch updated.
Forget to remove dsa_unpin in dsa.h, dsa_unpin is also not used since commit 13df76a537.
The gemel function dsa_pin is only used in pg_stat. Seems reasonable that we don’t need to call dsa_unpin in pg_stat.

Regards,
Zhang Mingli

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Remove-unused-functions-in-dsa.c.patch application/octet-stream 13.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-01-15 16:06:33 Re: logrep stuck with 'ERROR: int2vector has too many elements'
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-15 16:01:10 Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client