| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
| Date: | 2001-01-19 18:37:02 |
| Message-ID: | 9518.979929422@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I believe the formatting problem was that some code had
> "command;command; : lkjasfd : asldfk" while some had them spread over
> separate lines, and others used \n\, all very randomly. Now at least
> they are all consistent and use similar formatting.
And they may all be broken, except for the one(s) you have tested.
You shouldn't be assuming that a platform that uses gcc necessarily
also uses gas.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-19 18:39:22 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-19 18:24:51 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-19 18:39:22 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-19 18:24:51 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |