Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Date: 2001-01-19 18:40:16
Message-ID: 200101191840.NAA03406@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I believe the formatting problem was that some code had
> > "command;command; : lkjasfd : asldfk" while some had them spread over
> > separate lines, and others used \n\, all very randomly. Now at least
> > they are all consistent and use similar formatting.
>
> And they may all be broken, except for the one(s) you have tested.
> You shouldn't be assuming that a platform that uses gcc necessarily
> also uses gas.

Oh, wow, I never suspected gcc could work without gas. Can it?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-19 18:42:37 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-19 18:39:22 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-19 18:42:37 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-19 18:39:22 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup