Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...

> Cases with lots of irrelevant indexes. Zoltan's example had 4 indexes
> per child table, only one of which was relevant to the query. In your
> test case there are no irrelevant indexes, which is why the runtime
> didn't change.

Mmh... I must be doing something wrong. It looks to me it's not just
the irrelevant indexes: it's the "order by" that counts. If I remove that
times are the same with and without the patch:

using the test case:

explain select * from inh_parent
where timestamp1 between '2010-04-06' and '2010-06-25'

this one runs in the same time with the patch; but adding:

order by timestamp2

made the non-patched version run 3 times slower.

My test case:

create table t (a integer, b integer, c integer, d integer, e text);

DO $$DECLARE i int;
BEGIN
FOR i IN 0..2000 LOOP
EXECUTE 'create table t' || i || ' ( CHECK (a >' || i*10 || '
and a <= ' || (i+1)*10 || ' ) ) INHERITS (t)';
EXECUTE 'create index taidx' || i || ' ON t' || i || ' (a)';
EXECUTE 'create index tbidx' || i || ' ON t' || i || ' (b)';
EXECUTE 'create index tcidx' || i || ' ON t' || i || ' (c)';
EXECUTE 'create index tdidx' || i || ' ON t' || i || ' (d)';
END LOOP;
END$$;

explain select * from t where a > 1060 and a < 109000

this runs in 1.5 secs with and without the patch. But if I add

order by b

the non-patched version runs in 10 seconds.

Am I getting it wrong?