From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Revert "Secure Unix-domain sockets of "make check" temporary clu |
Date: | 2014-03-29 21:39:11 |
Message-ID: | 9484.1396129151@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 03/29/2014 04:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In this particular example the path is only about 7 characters too long,
>> but I suppose trying to shave off a few characters isn't really going
>> to be a robust solution.
> Since you have one of the offending buildfarm machines (dromedary) why
> not try this: in the build_env section of the config file, add
> PG_REGRESS_SOCK_DIR => "/Users/buildfarm/bf-data/$branch/",
I'm happy to tweak the config, but given that Noah reverted the patch,
what is it that we're testing exactly?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-03-29 22:10:57 | Re: pgsql: Revert "Secure Unix-domain sockets of "make check" temporary clu |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-29 21:34:14 | pgsql: Fix dumping of a materialized view that depends on a table's pri |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-29 21:44:14 | Re: [RFC] What should we do for reliable WAL archiving? |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-03-29 21:38:03 | Re: [RFC] What should we do for reliable WAL archiving? |