From: | David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Deriving release notes from git commit messages |
Date: | 2011-06-24 23:11:56 |
Message-ID: | 93D576D9-2325-46E1-BA3F-1022965F498F@endpoint.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 24, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 06/24/2011 01:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I am not inclined to try to track sponsors in the commit message at
>>> all.
>>
>> I was not suggesting that information be part of the commit. We've worked
>> out a reasonable initial process for the people working on sponsored
>> features to record that information completely outside of the commit or
>> release notes data. It turns out though that process would be easier to
>> drive if it were easier to derive a feature->{commit,author} list
>> though--and that would spit out for free with the rest of this. Improving
>> the ability to do sponsor tracking is more of a helpful side-effect of
>> something that's useful for other reasons rather than a direct goal.
>
> In taking a peek at the documentation and comments out on the interweb
> about "git amend," I don't think that it's going to be particularly
> successful if we try to capture all this stuff in the commit message
> and metadata, because it's tough to guarantee that *all* this data
> would be correctly captured at commit time, and you can't revise it
> after the commit gets pushed upstream.
Perhaps `git notes` could be something used to annotate these:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-notes.html
Regards,
David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
david(at)endpoint(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-06-24 23:19:39 | Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-24 23:01:49 | Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch |