From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jeff Boes" <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Are WALs affected by 'duplicate key' errors? |
Date: | 2001-11-16 19:51:31 |
Message-ID: | 9386.1005940291@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Jeff Boes" <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com> writes:
> We have an application that attempts many insertions into a table,
> detecting the prior existance of the row by whether we get a 'duplicate
> key in unique index' error. When this application is running as multiple
> copies and really cranking, we get 130K or more of these in a day. Are
> these filling up (and possibly messing up) our WALs?
Shouldn't be a problem.
> We have experienced a few shared-memory corruption errors, and a
> full-blown corruption (although of a different table).
The last couple of reports we got like that turned out to be hardware
problems (bad RAM, flaky disk controller, that sort of thing). It
wouldn't be a waste of time to run some hardware diagnostics.
I have been thinking about your report of trouble with the 7.1.2 to
7.1.3 upgrade, and I have to confess bafflement. There shouldn't be
any compatibility issue there AFAICS. Are you sure there wasn't
anything else that changed at the same time?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | AKACIA | 2001-11-16 22:53:31 | Rules <-> Functions <-> Permissions |
Previous Message | Jeff Boes | 2001-11-16 16:46:24 | Are WALs affected by 'duplicate key' errors? |