From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | twodragon72(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14764: #if HASH_DEBUG source in dynahash.c is fault. |
Date: | 2017-08-02 16:04:35 |
Message-ID: | 9352.1501689875@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
twodragon72(at)gmail(dot)com writes:
> dynahash.c
> #if HASH_DEBUG
> fprintf(stderr,
> "init_htab:\n%s%p\n%s%ld\n%s%ld\n%s%d\n%s%ld\n%s%u\n%s%x\n%s%x\n%s%ld\n%s%ld\n",
> "TABLE POINTER ", hashp,
> "DIRECTORY SIZE ", hctl->dsize,
> "SEGMENT SIZE ", hctl->ssize,
> "SEGMENT SHIFT ", hctl->sshift,
> "FILL FACTOR ", hctl->ffactor,
> "MAX BUCKET ", hctl->max_bucket,
> "HIGH MASK ", hctl->high_mask,
> "LOW MASK ", hctl->low_mask,
> "NSEGS ", hctl->nsegs,
> "NENTRIES ", hash_get_num_entries(hctl));
> #endif
> ", hash_get_num_entries(hctl));
> ->
> ", hash_get_num_entries(hashp));
Hm, yeah, that's broken, but I'm inclined to remove that field from the
printout rather than fix the computation. Since we just initialized the
hashtable, it can't possibly have any entries here. Also
hash_get_num_entries makes assumptions that we could do without in
debug code.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-02 16:41:50 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on a function index |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-02 15:36:54 | Re: BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on a function index |