Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced

From: Brian Williams <brian(dot)williams(at)mayalane(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Date: 2019-11-10 14:01:38
Message-ID: 9304620E-D288-4D02-9BC8-DDC545E4AB2D@mayalane.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs


Everyone,

Thank you for the attention paid to this.

Brian

> On Nov 8, 2019, at 10:37 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> On 8 Nov 2019, at 16:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical
>> definition for the first use? Works for me.
>
> Agreed.
>
> cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2019-11-11 09:19:52 Does TRUNCATE emit changes with REPLICA IDENTITY FULL?
Previous Message David Turoň 2019-11-09 23:19:52 Fwd: Re: auto_explain.log_min_duration is limit for nested statement