Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, brian(dot)williams(at)mayalane(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Date: 2019-11-08 15:37:18
Message-ID: 1040FDE9-3FF3-422D-B4BF-42881B754459@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

> On 8 Nov 2019, at 16:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical
> definition for the first use? Works for me.

Agreed.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-11-08 16:30:07 Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-11-08 15:19:20 Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced