Re: TLS docs fixes for <programlisting>

> On 14 May 2020, at 04:17, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> While working with TLS I noticed that the password callback definition had an
>> extra newline in the programlisting in the docs. Since the <programlisting>
>> has been indented with the textblock, the newline comes from whitespace being
>> significant. The attached 0001 fixes by instead anchoring <programlisting> on
>> column zero like how most of the docs do it. Grepping around I found one more
>> instance of the same pattern which is also included.
>
> Indeed, I can see the difference. In what I spotted after applying
> 0001, you are patching the one in libpq.sgml as of 0002 but in a
> different, correct, way, and I have spotted three more inconsistencies
> within doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml in the zone for timestamps.

Right, I omitted them to avoid churn since they are using <programlisting>
correctly, just in a different way from the rest of the docs. I'll leave the
call whether they should be included for consistency sake to you.

> With everything I found on top of your stuff, I finish with the
> attached. Does it look fine to you?

+1, thanks for picking it up!

cheers ./daniel