Re: Assertion on create index concurrently

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Assertion on create index concurrently
Date: 2021-06-27 15:37:16
Message-ID: 9238.1624808236@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:48:45PM +0300, Andrey Lepikhov wrote:
>> This problem affects PG 9.6 - 13. The master branch was fixed 9 months ago
>> by commit 83158f7, that made this operation transactional, but still.

> This looks like a good argument for back-patching 83158f7 all the way
> down, as 813fb03 exists since 9.4. Any thoughts from others?

+1 ... 83158f7 has survived long enough to have reasonable confidence
in it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2021-06-27 19:00:00 Re: BUG #17072: Assert for clogGroupNext failed due to a race condition in TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-27 14:12:38 Re: Socket (fd) to posters server getting closed. (libpq)