From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot |
Date: | 2020-11-28 20:30:11 |
Message-ID: | 905763.1606595411@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
I wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> In any case, note that there is also documentation about this at
>> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/docguide-toolsets.html#DOCGUIDE-TOOLSETS-CONFIGURE>
>> that would need to be updated to the new behavior. I think the phrase
>> "If xmllint was not found then some of the following tests will be
>> skipped." could be removed, since it referred to the DocBook test about
>> to be removed.
> Right. That also seems like a good place to add a hint about setting
> XMLLINT to 'xmllint --nonet' if you don't want remote fetches to happen
> while building the docs. Shall we do that instead of applying the
> patch you posted earlier?
Concretely, maybe like the attached?
(Looking at this, I can't avoid the feeling that the programs are being
checked for in a completely random order. I'm tempted to rearrange
configure to probe xmllint, xsltproc, fop, dbtoepub in that order,
so it matches the proposed documentation.)
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
docbook-probe-removal-docs.patch | text/x-diff | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mohammad Moghaddaszadeh | 2020-12-03 17:57:25 | Wiki editor request |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-28 16:28:52 | Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot |