| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Update list of combining characters |
| Date: | 2019-06-13 07:16:29 |
| Message-ID: | 90003d7c-9065-44ec-e64d-f775de129b31@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-06-04 22:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> AFAICT, these Unicode definitions haven't changed since that list was
> put in originally around 2006, so I wonder what's going on there.
>
> I have written a script that recomputes that list from the current
> Unicode data. Patch and script are attached. This makes those above
> cases all render correctly. (This should eventually get better built
> system integration.)
Any thoughts about applying this as
a) a bug fix with backpatching
b) just to master
c) wait for PG13
d) it's all wrong?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Timur Birsh | 2019-06-13 07:25:38 | Re: [PATCH] vacuumlo: print the number of large objects going to be removed |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-06-13 07:04:15 | Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw |