From: | Timur Birsh <taem(at)linukz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] vacuumlo: print the number of large objects going to be removed |
Date: | 2019-06-13 07:25:38 |
Message-ID: | 8940011560410738@sas2-7b909973f402.qloud-c.yandex.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Michael,
13.06.2019, 12:11, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>:
> Welcome. Nice to see that you have subscribed to the lists.
Thank you for your explanations!
> Now, if you want to get review for your patch, you should register it
> in what we call the commit fest app, which is here:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/
Done. Please see https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2148/
> Commit fests happen every two months for a duration of one month, and
> the next one which will begin the development cycle of v13 begins on
> the 1st of July. As a basic rule, it is expected that for one patch
> submitted, you should review another patch of equal difficulty to keep
> some balance in the force.
Ok.
> Regarding the patch, there is an argument to be made for reporting a
> rate as well as the actual numbers of deleted and to-delete items.
>
> + if (param->verbose)
> + {
> + snprintf(buf, BUFSIZE, "SELECT count(*) FROM vacuum_l");
> + res = PQexec(conn, buf);
> That part is costly.
Just to be sure, a new command line argument needs to be added for
reporting the numbers? Should it implies --verbose argument?
Thanks,
Timur
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-06-13 07:26:47 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-06-13 07:16:29 | Re: Update list of combining characters |