Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "sivapostgres(at)yahoo(dot)com" <sivapostgres(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects
Date: 2025-04-12 15:22:15
Message-ID: 8f0137a0-cadb-4fc2-8da9-29c9c2d07330@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 4/11/25 23:05, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Friday, April 11, 2025, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 4/11/25 22:06, sivapostgres(at)yahoo(dot)com
> <mailto:sivapostgres(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Either my command should be wrong or I'm missing something.
>
>
> This was explained in my post as  quoted below.
>
>
> Yeah, the short version.  Then you added a long version that just
> confused the issue.  Why point out exclude blobs if you know they are
> using bytea?

To show what --no-blobs is actually doing versus what the OP thought it
was doing, along with link to large object docs to show they are not bytea.

>
> David J.
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-04-12 17:44:44 Re: Clarification on the docs
Previous Message sivapostgres@yahoo.com 2025-04-12 07:11:02 Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects