| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Clarification on the docs |
| Date: | 2025-04-12 17:44:44 |
| Message-ID: | 371571.1744479884@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Because I’m undecided on what exactly would be an improvement and don’t
> care enough on the basis of this single question to put effort into
> figuring that out. Committers read these and if one of them wants to act
> on my new paragraph suggestion great. If not, it isn’t that big a deal.
> For me, this doesn’t warrant a CF entry.
I agree this list has gotten a little messy over time, and also that
it's not a big enough deal to warrant a formal patch process.
I tried to improve matters at
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=78637a8be
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brent Wood | 2025-04-12 21:21:49 | Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-04-12 15:22:15 | Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects |