Re: postgresql 8 abort with signal 10

From: Alexandre Biancalana <biancalana(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql 8 abort with signal 10
Date: 2005-05-03 20:56:53
Message-ID: 8e10486b050503135650e72a5a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ohhh god :(

The FreeBSD is the last STABLE version..... I can try to change some
hardware, I already changed memory, what can I try now ? the processor
? motherboard ??

On 5/3/05, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 15:04, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > Thank you for the detailed explanation Scott, they are very handy !!
> >
> > I reduced the shared_buffers to 32768, but the problem still occurs.....
> >
> > Any other idea ??
>
> Yeah, I had a sneaking suspicion that shared_buffers wasn't causing the
> issue really.
>
> Sounds like either a hardware fault, or a BSD bug. I'd check the BSD
> mailing lists for mention of said bug, and see if you can grab a spare
> drive and install the last stable version of FreeBSD 4.x and if that
> fixes the problem.
>
> If you decide to try linux, avoid the 2.6 kernel, it's still got
> issues... 2.4 is pretty stable.
>
> I really doubt it's a problem in postgresql itself though.
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-05-03 21:19:43 Re: Deep integration of PostgreSQL with Apache
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-05-03 20:34:02 Re: postgresql 8 abort with signal 10