| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deep integration of PostgreSQL with Apache |
| Date: | 2005-05-03 21:19:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4277EAEF.5030707@mailblocks.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces |
Robin Boerdijk wrote:
> Why would
> this web/database server be limited to using only one connection?
>
No it wouldn't. I misunderstood your question. It's one process/one
connection. If you don't use Apache as a multi-threaded server, then
your question makes more sense. Still, it's a lot of work to make it
happen and I'm not sure you'd gain anything. My advice would be to
consider a multi-threaded server that uses a connection pool and perhaps
include some shared caching of data that is more static in nature in the
middle tier. That could really save some context switches.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-05-03 21:27:56 | Favorable Postgresql write up |
| Previous Message | Alexandre Biancalana | 2005-05-03 20:56:53 | Re: postgresql 8 abort with signal 10 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zlatko Matic | 2005-05-03 22:04:41 | calculated identity field in views, again... |
| Previous Message | Frost, Mr. Michael (contractor) | 2005-05-03 20:51:53 | PQescapeBytea & PQunescapeBytea |