Re: Limit on number of databases in a Cluster ?

From: "Josh Harrison" <joshques(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "General postgres mailing list" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Limit on number of databases in a Cluster ?
Date: 2008-12-03 18:05:28
Message-ID: 8d89ea1d0812031005u1857004eu95f694cfcc0f19a5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Josh Harrison <joshques(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1. Is there a limit on the number of databases that can be in a single
> > postgres cluster?
>
> No. I'm sure there's a practical limit into the thousands where
> things start to get slower.
>
> > 2. Is there any performance impacts associated with having too many
> > databases in a cluster?
>
> Define too many. I've run a couple hundred before without it being a
> problem.
>
> > 3. Is there a good magical number for this limit ?
>
> Only the one that your testing tells you there is. Got a rough guess
> of how many you want to run? How busy they'll be? that kind of
> thing.

About 10-15 ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-12-03 18:10:29 Re: two postgres server seeing the same data
Previous Message Joey K. 2008-12-03 18:00:17 Switch off PITR