| From: | Amit Gupta <amit(dot)pc(dot)gupta(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org, swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au |
| Subject: | Table Partitioning Feature |
| Date: | 2009-01-22 12:38:45 |
| Message-ID: | 8d79a95c0901220438s197e9a76t94b9b4b072789bea@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
We are implementing table partitioning feature to support
- the attached commands. The syntax conforms to most of the suggestion
mentioned in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00413.php, barring
the following:
-- Specification of partition names is optional. System will be able to
generate partition names in such cases.
-- sub partitioning
We are using pgsql triggers to push/move data to appropriate partitions,
but we will definitely consider moving to C language triggers as suggested
by manu.
- Global non-partitioned indexes (that will extend all the partitions).
- Foreign key support for tables referring to partitioned tables.
Please feel free to post your comments and suggestions.
Thanks,
Amit
Persistent Systems
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Part_table_stmt.txt | text/plain | 5.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-22 12:52:44 | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-01-22 12:22:58 | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |