Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))
Date: 2009-01-22 12:52:44
Message-ID: 49786C1C.1080603@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> as I understand, there are already plans to utilize this feature. If so,
> we need to be more attentive by now.

Is there? If I understood Simon correctly in the last paragraphs of
these emails:

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1221470800.3913.1229.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1221555881.3913.1761.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant

he has no immediate use for this.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-01-22 13:01:21 Re: [Fwd: Re: Transactions and temp tables]
Previous Message Amit Gupta 2009-01-22 12:38:45 Table Partitioning Feature