From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2025-02-24 21:01:00 |
Message-ID: | 8d13e4296408c53a93390525d0bcb906cbd13df4.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2025-02-24 at 15:53 -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't think that's necessarily true, hot pruning might help some,
> as afaict
> the restore happens in multiple transactions.
Yeah, I just dumped and reloaded the regression database with and
without stats, and saw no difference in the resulting size. So it's
probably more correct to say "churn" rather than "bloat".
Even running "psql -1", I see modest bloat substantially less than 2x.
So if we agree that we don't mind a bit of churn and we will never need
this (despite what ANALYZE does), then I'm OK removing it. Which makes
me wonder why ANALYZE does it with inplace updates?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2025-02-24 21:01:09 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-24 20:53:56 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |