Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Date: 2022-11-07 14:40:21
Message-ID: 8ce71818-c3f3-84a1-8f66-e1ae9f6c0f79@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/7/22 08:02, Tom Lane wrote:
[snip]
> call. It'd still be recommendable to pg_dumpall and restore into
> a freshly-initdb'd cluster, because otherwise you can't be real
> sure that you identified and cleared all the data corruption.

Why *just* pg_dumpall instead of "pg_dumpall --globals-only" and parallel
(for speed) dumps of databases?

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-11-07 15:43:21 Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Previous Message Stefan Froehlich 2022-11-07 14:05:04 Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault