Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Date: 2022-11-07 15:43:21
Message-ID: 3238317.1667835801@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/7/22 08:02, Tom Lane wrote:
>> call. It'd still be recommendable to pg_dumpall and restore into
>> a freshly-initdb'd cluster, because otherwise you can't be real
>> sure that you identified and cleared all the data corruption.

> Why *just* pg_dumpall instead of "pg_dumpall --globals-only" and parallel
> (for speed) dumps of databases?

[ shrug... ] Sure, if you like to make your life complicated.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2022-11-07 15:51:58 Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
Previous Message Ron 2022-11-07 14:40:21 Re: server process (PID 2964738) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault