Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, rirans(at)comcast(dot)net, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles
Date: 2020-01-07 10:46:31
Message-ID: 8c2f4f1b90c993c8c6338b978a78a9ebbcd1c934.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, 2019-12-27 at 12:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:44:10AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/default-roles.html
> > Description:
> >
> > The title is wrong. The roles are not defaults; they are predefined and
> > privileged. The title suggests that a user should expect to be assigned
> > these roles. "21.5 Sub-Administrator Roles" would be accurate--improving
> > clarity over all and removing any need to explain why postgres is not in
> > this list of roles.
> >
>
> Good points. I have developed the attached documentation patch which
> includes your ideas.

+1

I think that "predefined role" is better than "default role".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2020-01-08 18:20:04 Multiple window definitions
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2020-01-07 10:41:29 Re: is_nullable column of information_schema.columns table