From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, rirans(at)comcast(dot)net, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles |
Date: | 2020-01-07 10:46:31 |
Message-ID: | 8c2f4f1b90c993c8c6338b978a78a9ebbcd1c934.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, 2019-12-27 at 12:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:44:10AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/default-roles.html
> > Description:
> >
> > The title is wrong. The roles are not defaults; they are predefined and
> > privileged. The title suggests that a user should expect to be assigned
> > these roles. "21.5 Sub-Administrator Roles" would be accurate--improving
> > clarity over all and removing any need to explain why postgres is not in
> > this list of roles.
> >
>
> Good points. I have developed the attached documentation patch which
> includes your ideas.
+1
I think that "predefined role" is better than "default role".
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2020-01-08 18:20:04 | Multiple window definitions |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2020-01-07 10:41:29 | Re: is_nullable column of information_schema.columns table |