From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | rirans(at)comcast(dot)net, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles |
Date: | 2020-01-14 18:13:31 |
Message-ID: | 20200114181331.GB10430@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:46:31AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-27 at 12:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:44:10AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> > >
> > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/default-roles.html
> > > Description:
> > >
> > > The title is wrong. The roles are not defaults; they are predefined and
> > > privileged. The title suggests that a user should expect to be assigned
> > > these roles. "21.5 Sub-Administrator Roles" would be accurate--improving
> > > clarity over all and removing any need to explain why postgres is not in
> > > this list of roles.
> > >
> >
> > Good points. I have developed the attached documentation patch which
> > includes your ideas.
>
> +1
>
> I think that "predefined role" is better than "default role".
Thanks, patch applied through 9.6.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-01-14 19:45:02 | Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2020-01-11 21:21:38 | Listing Drivers in the Docs (was: "Re: Postgres.js driver - for Node.js") |