Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)

From: Rui DeSousa <rui(at)crazybean(dot)net>
To: raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)
Date: 2020-04-29 00:20:53
Message-ID: 8EC9D082-B541-435F-9EE3-3ED14AA3C2D1@crazybean.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 28, 2020, at 7:43 PM, raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org> wrote:
>
> I just use "text" for everything. It's less typing. :-)
>

Ugh, I see it as sign that the designers of the schema didn’t fully think about the actual requirements or care about them and it usually shows.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2020-04-29 00:34:00 Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)
Previous Message raf 2020-04-28 23:49:56 Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-04-29 00:22:54 Re: Pulling up sublink may break join-removal logic
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-04-29 00:15:06 Re: pg_rewind docs correction