From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_rewind docs correction |
Date: | 2020-04-29 00:15:06 |
Message-ID: | 20200429001506.GH279958@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> I think is missing a word. Instead of "especially the the target"
> should be "especially if the target".
Thanks, fixed.
> In this block:
>
> + Create a <filename>backup_label</filename> file to begin WAL replay at
> + the checkpoint created at failover and configure the
> + <filename>pg_control</filename> file with a minimum consistency LSN
> + defined as the result of <literal>pg_current_wal_insert_lsn()</literal>
> + when rewinding from a live source and using the last checkpoint LSN
> + when rewinding from a stopped source.
> + </para>
>
> Perhaps change "and using the last checkpoint LSN" to "or the last
> checkpoint LSN". Alternatively you could make the grammar parallel by
> changing to "and defined as the last checkpoint LSN", but that seems
> wordy, and the "defined as [item or item]" is already a good grammar
> construction.
Using your first suggestion of "or the last checkpoint LSN" sounds
more natural as of this morning, so updated the patch with that.
I am letting that aside for a couple of days to see if others have
more comments, and will likely commit it after an extra lookup.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v6-0001-Improve-pg_rewind-explanation-and-warnings.patch | text/x-diff | 8.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rui DeSousa | 2020-04-29 00:20:53 | Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length) |
Previous Message | raf | 2020-04-28 23:49:56 | Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length) |