RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics for wait event

From: "Yotsunaga, Naoki" <yotsunaga(dot)naoki(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'legrand legrand' <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics for wait event
Date: 2018-11-13 02:04:13
Message-ID: 8E9126CB6CE2CD42962059AB0FBF7B0DC636AE@g01jpexmbkw23
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 6:39 PM, legrand legrand wrote:

Hi, Thanks for comments.
I had overlooked the reply from you.

>You are right, sampling has to be "tuned" regarding the event(s) you want to catch.
I see. For tuning, you need to know the length of processing you want to sample?

> May I invite you to try it, using PASH-viewer (github) with pgsentinel (github).
I'll check and try it.

------------------
Naoki Yotsunaga

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-13 02:05:59 Re: Pull up sublink of type 'NOT NOT (expr)'
Previous Message Julian Hsiao 2018-11-13 02:02:22 Possible buffer overrun in src/backend/libpq/hba.c gethba_options()