| From: | legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics for wait event |
| Date: | 2018-10-29 06:39:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1540795159082-0.post@n3.nabble.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
You are right, sampling has to be "tuned" regarding the event(s) you want to
catch.
Sampling of 1 second interval is good with treatments that take hours, and
not enough for a minute or a second analysis.
May I invite you to try it, using PASH-viewer (github) with pgsentinel
(github).
Changing pgsentiel.c sampling from 1 second
rc = WaitLatch(MyLatch, WL_LATCH_SET | WL_TIMEOUT | WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH,
ash_sampling_period * 1000L,PG_WAIT_EXTENSION);
to 1/10 second
rc = WaitLatch(MyLatch, WL_LATCH_SET | WL_TIMEOUT | WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH,
ash_sampling_period * 100L,PG_WAIT_EXTENSION);
seems the good balance for me (for analysis periods from a few seconds to
minutes).
Regards
PAscal
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-10-29 06:58:17 | Re: BUG #15449: file_fdw using program cause exit code error when using LIMIT |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-10-29 06:35:09 | Re: why commutator doesn't work? |