Re: Fix bank selection logic in SLRU

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix bank selection logic in SLRU
Date: 2024-12-19 12:10:05
Message-ID: 899F5F09-0C56-4812-BCC2-C36CE36A4F8E@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 19 Dec 2024, at 15:37, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> So, there's no more than 8192 banks at the moment.

OK, but still current type indicates bitwise usage, while struct member is used as a number.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2024-12-19 12:22:04 Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans?
Previous Message Nishant Sharma 2024-12-19 12:07:51 Re: [PROPOSAL] : Disallow use of empty column name in (column_name '') in ALTER or CREATE of foreign table.