From: | Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix bank selection logic in SLRU |
Date: | 2024-12-19 15:48:14 |
Message-ID: | 2c6c20c0-35a3-400c-80b2-fa995f2dd4d1@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
19.12.2024 15:10, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>
>
>> On 19 Dec 2024, at 15:37, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>>
>> So, there's no more than 8192 banks at the moment.
>
> OK, but still current type indicates bitwise usage, while struct member is used as a number.
Ok, I agree. Here's version with type change bits16 -> uint16.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Fix-SLRU-bank-selection.patch | text/x-patch | 2.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-12-19 15:57:31 | Re: Parametrization minimum password lenght |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-12-19 15:40:25 | Re: Parametrization minimum password lenght |