| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |
| Date: | 2001-10-19 01:12:10 |
| Message-ID: | 8969.1003453930@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> There aren't any: SQL92 and SQL99 have no such feature. (Although I
>> notice that they list LIMIT as a word likely to become reserved in
>> future versions.)
> But according to the list in the PostgreSQL docs OFFSET is not a
> reserved word. Is it one of the 'likely to become reserved' words?
Nope, it's not listed. There's no guarantee that their intended use
is the same as ours, anyway, so I don't put any stock in this as a
reason to make a decision now. It was just an observation in passing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joel Burton | 2001-10-19 01:17:30 | Re: Backup Postgre Windows to Linux |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-19 00:56:57 | Re: Large Files? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2001-10-19 01:25:19 | Re: When will vacuum go away? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-19 00:51:07 | Re: PQstatus() detect change in connection... |